incomprehension! Why do users still silently tolerate Apple signal issues that affect "normal use"?

Why is everyone willing to tolerate the impact of Apple signals on usage? I recently looked at iPhone 14 and wanted to buy an Apple phone to replace my current Android. However, after learning about my friends who use Apple and online evaluations, I found that Apple is not very good at basic function signals of the phone. Moreover, after experiencing my friends, I found that this signal test is really urgent, but Apple's sales are actually so good, So I really want to know why everyone can tolerate the situation where basic functions of mobile phones are flawed?

I think it's obviously inappropriate to use the word 'endure'. Apple does have a much weaker signal in some extreme scenarios! (For example, traveling on high-speed trains in mountains, in mountains, subways, underground garages, elevators, etc.) But how many of us would appear particularly frequently in such scenes?

A very heartwarming fact, although the core function of a mobile phone is to make phone calls and social communication! But since the advent of smartphones, many people's social needs have been low, and smartphones are more of an entertainment value for companionship! There are not so many urgent matters, it's only in time to handle them in a place with good signals!

Sometimes I have to make phone calls, surf the internet, chat on WeChat, and spend more time in normal office spaces and at home. Even on the road, the vast majority are places with good signals! Even if the model of an Apple phone is broken, to put it mildly, it will not have a significant impact on daily use!

Unless urgent matters need to be handled in some special scenarios and poor network signal is found, it may be particularly urgent! But if you meet someone, many people will quickly tell them that the signal here is not good, and I will call you back in the office or go to a place with good signal, and then reply to you with messages and other behaviors!

It's not without a solution!

But compared to weaker signals, some domestic phones have very good signals, which is a selling point! But there are also quite a few advertisements on mobile phones, with a relatively simple interface and no annoying advertising information compared to the advertising machine. Which one would you choose! Compared to some extreme scenarios where the signal is weak and advertising is tolerated, which one would you choose?

Compared to a slightly weaker signal, domestic phones may vary in their ability to take photos and videos. However, when it comes to taking videos, many evaluation experts have always suggested buying an iPhone, especially in today's high frequency of taking photos and videos. Would you prioritize signal strength or a better phone for taking videos and photos?

The weaker social relationships become, sometimes the more they care about them! You use an apple, she uses an apple, what I use, and using other phones will be out of place. From the office to the best friend bureau, and then to hobbies and friends. Apple phones have appeared too often in many offline social occasions, so many people consider prioritizing them in order to better integrate into society!

In fact, with so many examples, what I want to say is that if the essence of a phone is that the phone signal is very important, you must choose a phone with excellent signal! But from a smartphone perspective, calling is only a small requirement. Sometimes it's normal to not have a phone call for several days! As long as the signal is good and sufficient in public scenarios, what do you think of it? Welcome to follow me, entrepreneur Li Meng, and share with me!