Wang Teng Responds to OnePlus' "Surpass Xiaomi" Goal: Redmi's Market Share Exceeds OPPO + OnePlus, Sparking Nationwide Discussion

Wang Teng Responds to OnePlus' "Surpass Xiaomi" Goal: Redmi's Market Share Exceeds OPPO + OnePlus, Sparking Nationwide DiscussionThe competitive atmosphere among Chinese smartphone brands this year is noticeably calmer than last year, but undercurrents of rivalry still exist. On November 19th, a piece of news sparked heated discussion: OnePlus' domestic president, Li Jie, reiterated the company's goal of surpassing Xiaomi's single-brand market share in an interview

Wang Teng Responds to OnePlus' "Surpass Xiaomi" Goal: Redmi's Market Share Exceeds OPPO + OnePlus, Sparking Nationwide Discussion

The competitive atmosphere among Chinese smartphone brands this year is noticeably calmer than last year, but undercurrents of rivalry still exist. On November 19th, a piece of news sparked heated discussion: OnePlus' domestic president, Li Jie, reiterated the company's goal of surpassing Xiaomi's single-brand market share in an interview. Redmi brand general manager, Wang Teng, promptly responded, stating that Redmi's market share has already surpassed that of OPPO and OnePlus combined. Even including realme, the impact on Redmi's lead is negligible. This response quickly became a trending topic online, generating widespread discussion.

The incident originated from an interview where Li Jie, in discussing OnePlus' goals, once again emphasized their ambition to surpass Xiaomi as a single brand, claiming it wouldn't take long. This statement immediately prompted a response from Wang Teng. On social media, Wang Teng stated that while the timeframe for OnePlus' goal remains unclear, Redmi has already achieved a market share exceeding that of OPPO and OnePlus combined (including OnePlus itself), even before the launch of the Redmi K80 series. He added that even factoring in realme wouldn't significantly affect Redmi's leading position.

Wang Teng's remarks quickly ignited online discussions, with the topic "Wang Teng responds to OnePlus' goal of surpassing Xiaomi" trending on various platforms. Many netizens expressed agreement with Wang Teng's response, with comments overwhelmingly supporting Redmi's achievements. Some netizens commented that they initially only expected to witness a OnePlus-Xiaomi competition but were surprised to see OPPO and realme unexpectedly drawn into the fray, resulting in a Pyrrhic victory for OnePlus.

Online comments overwhelmingly supported Redmi's perspective. Many comments vividly illustrated the event, suggesting that while initially anticipating a OnePlus versus Xiaomi showdown, the competition unexpectedly involved OPPO and realme, creating a more complex competitive landscape.

Objective data supports Wang Teng's statements. Recent market data shows Xiaomi's domestic market share at approximately 7.29%, while OnePlus holds less than 1.84%. This means Xiaomi's market share is almost four times that of OnePlus. Furthermore, Xiaomi's average phone price in recent years has been above 3000 yuan (approximately $420 USD), or even higher. Achieving such a high market share in this price range demonstrates its strong competitiveness.

The rivalry between Xiaomi and OnePlus is long-standing, with their history of conflict well-known to the public. However, Xiaomi seems less focused on direct competition with other brands now, shifting its emphasis to the high-end market and vying for market share with Apple. This strategic shift is also reflected in Xiaomi's responses to competition. For example, during the most intense competition last year, Xiaomi chose to remain silent, entrusting the task of competition to the Redmi brand.

The strong sales of the Xiaomi 14 series were initially attributed by some to its first-mover advantage. However, the sales of the Xiaomi 15 series surpassed those of the Xiaomi 14 series without benefiting from a first-mover advantage, effectively refuting those skeptical voices.

It's evident that mere verbal sparring doesn't enhance brand image; instead, it can lower brand approval ratings. True competition should focus on actual user needs and excel in product and service quality. Xiaomi's strategic shift reflects this: prioritizing its product improvement and market positioning rather than engaging in pointless verbal battles. Xiaomi's current target is Apple, aiming to capture market share from the tech giant its true competitor.

This incident reveals a shift in the focus of competition in the Chinese smartphone market. Simple market share battles are giving way to deeper competitions, such as vying for high-end market share and competing in technological innovation. Each brand is actively adjusting its strategy to adapt to market changes. Consumers benefit from this, experiencing more diversified and higher-quality products and services. Wang Teng's response interprets the new dynamics of the domestic smartphone market: It's no longer a simple "winner-takes-all" scenario, but rather a greater focus on brand building and product competitiveness. Data and actual sales speak the loudest. Fierce rhetoric eventually subsides within the waves of market competition. Xiaomi, Redmi, OnePlus, OPPO, and other smartphone brands are constantly adjusting their strategies in this ongoing competition, seeking their own development and breakthroughs. Consumers will ultimately be the beneficiaries of this competition. The future landscape of the Chinese smartphone market remains to be seen. This incident is merely a snapshot of market competition, foreshadowing the complexity and diversity of future competition. Brands will face more challenges and opportunities, and the ultimate winners will be those that genuinely understand and meet consumer needs. The "surpass Xiaomi" goal will face even more rigorous tests in future market competition. Ultimately, consumer experience and product quality will be the key determinants of brand success. This competition is far from over.

Finally, Wang Teng's response is less a reflection of commercial competition and more an interpretation of changing market dynamics. It reflects a shift in the competitive strategies of Chinese smartphone brands, moving from simple market share struggles to a greater emphasis on product strength and brand building. The ultimate beneficiaries of this competition are undoubtedly consumers, who will gain access to a more diverse and higher-quality selection of products.